over this image : [link]
Strength and Humility ??
its not really humility if youve got your nipnips on show. Inappropreate choice of title. Also this is average at best. Deviant art seems to be coated with the tatty unoriginal wank fodder of this type of "arty" photography.
Dont get me wrong, im not a good photographer. But i have eyes, working ones, and ive seen this shot with 1000 different girls byt 100s of other below avaerag photographers.
I know it may seem harsh, maybe its because thats what i intend it to be. But i just fed up with the same old same old. People posting up an image of an almost nakid body, doing a shadowy pose and looking moody. A pickture thats always pawed over by spotty dateless loosers desperate for a shag but with no idea what a real woman is like. Take your first responce. Its all about how good looking the girl is. No comment on photographic skill or image quality.
You could say that you are not to blame for the seixst morons of the world or at least deviantart, but you must be aware that the nude ladys bring the slobbering boys and the boys are the main reason that people post up the pictures ofthe nude ladys.
Theres no creative ideas or style anymore. This is nothing ive not seen in fhm or some bad lifestyle magazine.
10 steps to a fitter body or such.
I just crave for something challenging , origninal or completely and utterly mindblowing. An image to change how people look at the world , if only a bit of it , if only for a moment.
Or just something that redefines the classic female photo.
This really isnt just directed at you i suppose, but everyone who posts female / female nudes here... or pictures of two girls who might just be about to kiss..... like... coor , lesbians. *snigger snigger*
But your picture is the one that ive seen here today, and it is the one that ive found least interesting ... although ironically so... I would like to see if this reply creates any sort of eather change in style , oir just some thoughtful debate.











--
Just because I am a novice, doesn't mean I can't dream as well as you.
And it is an image style that has been done 1000 times before. right?
yes i didnt say anything good about the photographers skill but i didnt say anything bad about his skill. And thats the thing. my comments are ultimately a reflection on 1. the lack of actual constructive comments (talking about how fit the girl is isnt constructive and ultimately isnt even about the photo... its just modal ogling)
2. The sheer number of photos that look the same as the one commented on macking it indistinguishable from many others .
3. The title's inappropreate use. I saw no humility. More a mildly interesting posed, almost nacked modal, with a pritty much expressionless face. If its called humility then i want to see humility the artist or photographer really bring that out in the image. This is an art site after all.
Lastly , i said im no good a photographer. If you look through my works its a mix of all sorts of things. all pritty low grade. If you want to know the toy pictures are done in responce to all the gothy doll pictures for a laugh. but feel free to comment on them as you see fit. I'd be interested to see what you say. At the very least i've not given them a pretetious title, and the images attempt an interesting pose or angle. Its bad photography , but its trying..lol. Also you cant come here and say "You criticize artwork harshly, but yours is...action figures." Because that just proves my point that people are just looking at the modal invovled and not looking at the work of the artist... Sure its an action figure... but thats nothing to dowith the quality of the shot. And neather is the nakid girl....
--
Just because I am a novice, doesn't mean I can't dream as well as you.
no hey..
anyway my wrong..
--
: I wanna take away Alice~~
~~Sorry for my english..
--
curses!...i can never think of a good signature ;_;
--
But, John. If the Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists.
Previous Page12345...Next Page